You're having a hard time with this, aren't you?
-
-
-
No, not really.
-
You failed miserably yesterday. And I have to say, your people need to work on their optics. Literally everyone there looked like greasy crackheads.
-
> failed miserably Certified a Class 3 felony charge.
-
What I'm confused about is whether it was the illegal use with or without malice that was certified - reporting descriptions vary a bit on this.
-
With malice. The confusion stems from the court db not reflecting the amended upcharge
-
Amended upcharge? So the first illegal use w/ malice charge was dropped but the one w/o malice got upped to w/ malice?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They just keep digging the hole deeper ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
-
And yet 2/3 of the charges were dismissed as bull...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why no gun charges? Isn’t he a felon who flaunts being in possession of firearms? 5 year minimum.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hey, do you know who beanie man is? Do you think he'll come forward and press charges, so this case can continue?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I saw someone jailed for perjury for lying in a trademark infringement case. They need to be charged.
-
Goad first.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.