There is no path that white supremacy and fascism can take where they achieve their goals without violence.
-
-
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
This is why they must be opposed early and dramatically. There is no moral equivocation, the path itself is an act of first violence.
1 reply 40 retweets 119 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
We can, at times, when the situation allows, permit the fascists to throw the first *and second* punch. But never the third.
1 reply 26 retweets 79 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
On a12, the first act of violence was them showing up to promote genocide. The second act of violence was when they attacked clergy.
1 reply 28 retweets 62 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
They drove across state lines with carefully-constructed shields and makeshift weapons and guns. This was to create violence.
1 reply 26 retweets 70 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
Because *their existence is violence* and had we not been there, they would have driven through the town to *find violence*.
1 reply 22 retweets 67 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
This is not a meritless claim because they did this *many times* before a12.
1 reply 13 retweets 48 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
No antifa on a12 acted violently without first letting them throw two punches.
3 replies 19 retweets 54 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
they threw a lot of "punches" in the 1930/40s. why give more leniency?
2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.