I know, that's why I put the "necessarily" in my comment. I believe both approaches are merited, according to circumstances & the individual
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But not actually physically attacking them, rather being brave, in a present, vocal, united opposition willing to use self defense, right?pic.twitter.com/l70bw1dyec
-
No, by punching their Nazi faces until we beat the racist out of them. That IS self defense.
-
Nope. That's called assault. Listen, I get it. I'm every bit as angry as you. But this is still America. They are free to speak whatever...
-
Nope, they aren't, advocating genocide combined with credible power to back it up is incitement, not free speech.pic.twitter.com/0JAZYqA3GA
-
doesn't give YOU the right to offensively attack someone. Then YOU'D be breaking the law. Why give Nazi's even a semblance of credibility?
-
Not attack - fight back in self defense. Read a history book, doing nothing and letting Nazis talk is lets them seize power.
-
no, its the opposite. silencing them gives them power. letting them talk exposes how moronic they are.
-
That's what they said last time too, and it didn't work. Read. A History. Book.pic.twitter.com/t54JyGCWqU
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
When we stop embracing the preferred method of peace we slowly begin ceding the moral high grnd & give credence to Orange Julius' arguments.
-
I'm not sure it's possible to cede the moral high ground to a Nazi
-
In the court of popular opinion, sadly, it's very possible. It's what Hitl...I mean Trump is attempting to do by delegitamizing the left.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I will fight the shit right out of a Nazi
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.