I was thinking that talking about who should have or could have won in 2016 is a great conversation for after the fascism is gone.
The competent one will definitely kill you when it is profitable to do so, but the incompetent one is out there being a yahoo....
-
-
if you give an incompetant warmonger a military it loses influence and has to focus on autonomy, competent leadership lets it grow quickly
-
True, true. But it also bombs a lot of people thanks to the inertia from the previous 44 warmongers
-
the global military dominance asserted by the us is currently precarious, but a decade of successfull interventionism could have cemented it
-
chance of 100yrs of ambient bombings and political assassination of foreign citizens is imo the most concerning thing re american politics
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.