Yeah. Unfortunately the specifics of this particular case hard to argue against the church (vote was 7-2)....but I'm always pretty clear cut
-
-
-
If the church wants public funds for things they do (in this case making a playground safer) they have to sacrifice other status.
-
How do "religious orgs" get to argue against having to follow federal law on say birth control but then also get public funds?
-
Or how can they have access to tax payer $$$$ without having to give up tax exempt status?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sadly your tweet & responses thereto prove the failing of our education system. Constitution is written in English. Understanding needed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Actually agree with the Trinity Luthern case ***if
#Footnote3 is included*** - but yeah pretty much what I expected from Gorsuch on#SCOTUSThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is what passes for "great again."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Speechless :-|
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
POTUS Trump is really going to get tired of being right all the time! Supreme Court.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's NOT A "MUSLIM BAN"! And if it were it's highly ineffective because none of the top 10 Muslim populated countries are even on the list!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Only FOOLS BET AGAINST
@realDonaldTrump!! WINNING!! -
*eye roll*
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Noooo...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.