Again, I would think depends on the scale of error. The "novice" in question, however, clearly didn't care to get it "right"
-
-
He has a patter of outwardly racist research that begs the question, zero concern for research ethics, and cavaliet dismissal of critique.
-
He doesn't want to be a member of the OS/OD communities. He wants to use it as a smokescreen for racism.
-
Whatever point is being made about OS/OD here, EK is not an exemplar of any of it. He is flatly immoral, and tries to use OS to cover that.
-
yup we're all on the same page about that - I think we're introspecting about how to handle it better in future
-
TBH I think it got handled well in real time. One important takeaway: ethic of openness doesn't override ethics of research and science.
-
Most important thing is to not lose forest for trees because we're so dogmatic/attached to openness principle
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Just to be clear, that was a misunderstanding on my part, bc I tried to make a slightly different point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.