I never said they were the only words that counted, just highlighted the ones that prove my point.
-
-
Replying to @OfficialPonz @EmilyGorcenski
Yes, if we ignore all the other words and pretend only those three words exist, your point is proven. Otherwise, it's disproven.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @alexandraerin @EmilyGorcenski
If you're okay with using violence to silence opposition and don't consider youreself a fascist there is no hope for you. Enjoy your anger.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @OfficialPonz @EmilyGorcenski
Your own definition that you just cited clearly says I'm not. So I guess there's no hope for you either. We're hopeless together! Yay!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
And for the record, I'm not okay with using violence to "silence opposition" in a general sense. But resist fascism? It's a moral imperative
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
You pro-fascists are all the same. "SO IT'S OKAY TO ATTACK ANYONE WHO DISAGREES WITH YOU?" My dude, this is not about the best ninja turtle.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
"IF YOU CAN ATTACK PEOPLE TO RESIST FASCISM WHERE IS THE LINE?" At resisting fascism. That's a pretty clear line.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Fascists just literally forced a candidate in Iowa to withdraw from a race with death threats. That's what you're defending here.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
This is not about fighting people over opinions or beliefs, it's about actively resisting a system that would silence us with lethal force.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
If you study fascism beyond cherrypicking three words from a dictionary, you'll find that fascism co-opts and corrupts levers of democracy.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes
And if you also studied political systems you'd find several that overlap with those 3 words, too. Almost like the other words matter.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.