i had read the thread completed up to that point, Emily. i expanded a point of clarity — not to question you, but to enhance your thread
Yes but I don't want to do that. I just want you to say, "sorry for unsolicited explanations for stuff you knew about already."
-
-
idk you or what you know firsthand from history in real time dating to the early ’90s. for all i know, you're a hatchling in tech, right?
-
So the appropriate response here is to ask me before assuming I'm ignorant. Do you see how the latter can be hurtful?
-
You, by your admission, don't know me. So your first response was to assume my inferiority and ignorance.
-
i see that a) you're also
#folkslikeus, b) in tech, c) verified, and d) responding defensively on a topic you imply you know best of all -
Never once implied I know the topic best of all. Never anywhere did I make any such claim prior to your response.
-
your visceral reaction implied all of it. your speaking on the thread w/o prefacing what you may not know implied authority, as did your √
-
Yeah my verified mark has nothing to do with it, except that having a verified check means I get a lot of shitty mentions alll the time.
-
So I never once implied top expertise. You inferred it and projected that on me.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.