@EmilyGorcenski Your statements about Fitbit in your @JSConfEU felt slanderous. I can provide more context if you’d like to discuss.
-
-
I worked at Fitbit for 4 years. People there cared a lot and thought deeply about ethics.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Not a helpful comment. Unexpected consequences of something you create is a fact. Accepting that and learning from that is key. :)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
The statement, “A woman's life is ruined bc no one at Fitbit would stand up to say their devices were inaccurate,” contains many fallacies.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
"The fitbit data sealed the deal." -prosecuting attorney. Sorry, a woman stood trial 1000 miles from home and a device gave her no choice.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @JeremiahLee and
1 in 5 women will be sexually assaulted. 1 in 2 trans people will. Most go unreported for fear of not being believed.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Data from Fitbit devices has also been used in multiple cases to affirm reports of victims or help convict offenders.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yes and it shouldn't be.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
A fitbit is not a medical device. It's not subject to QSRs and cGMP. It should not be considered an unimpeachable expert witness.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.