The ACLU believes it to be true. But the practicalities are far from true.
-
-
I believe it does, you believe it does, but until it *actually gets applied* the veracity of the statement is unclear.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
This shit is actually getting applied, though. Macy v Holder was fucking 2012. Yes, T7, but the two are almost always interpreted similarly.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emily_esque
Funny, a school district not too far from where I live sees otherwise.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
Yeah, I almost worked there as a public defender, weirdly enough, but then I became an administrative lawyer. You know, the rule-writers.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emily_esque
That's great. Keep spreading the good word about what's technically true but functionally non-existant in practice.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @emily_esque
Cuz I've actually had care denied. I've had friends turned away "illegally" from the Social Security office.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @emily_esque
Everything that I listed in that thread was a true story that happened to someone I know.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @emily_esque
So great. It's illegal. Technically we have xyz right. But there's zero enforcement, zero practical means for securing those rights.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
There's "zero enforcement" because people get told by people like you that it's allowed.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Sure, blame the person affected instead of the people violating the law.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.