This is fucking illegal and it doesn't sound like the ~verified~ person saying this is a lawyer.https://twitter.com/emilygorcenski/status/859502556665569288 …
-
-
Replying to @emily_esque
@EmilyGorcenski is feeding false information to her 13k followers because making things sound as incendiary as possible is her schtick.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emily_esque @EmilyGorcenski
and here's the thing: SHIT IS BAD. but we don't need to make people believe they don't have legal rights THAT ARE ABOUT TO BE VOTED ON.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
-
Replying to @marcyjcook @emily_esque
What I'm talking about is NOT what is about to be voted on. The Section 1557 remand and stay has NOTHING to do with AHCA.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Section 1557 was interpreted last year to be such that trans discrimination and sex discrimination were identical. This ruling was enjoined.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
That injunction came as the result of a lawsuit about trans coverage and abortion coverage.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @marcyjcook
That injunction didn't do anything to undo people's statutory rights under §1557.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emily_esque @marcyjcook
The injunction stopped enforcement of the rule, leaving private suits as the only option.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Private suits are largely ineffective, and 180,000 trans Americans, myself included, have experienced denied care under the status quo.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.