The last version of this EO gave governments vast leeway to flat out deny trans folk's gender.
-
-
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
There was even talk of invalidating government documents where gender had been changed. I could be stateless.
2 replies 12 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
Fuck it. I had already sketched out a safety plan and it looks like I might actually go make that happen.
4 replies 3 retweets 22 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
Crappy quality but this was in the draft. Next few tweets transcribes it.pic.twitter.com/eNbLmlZzyN
2 replies 5 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
Actually nm, here.pic.twitter.com/rGf0Q6ONbt
3 replies 12 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
Open season on tranniespic.twitter.com/MsXKe37IS6
1 reply 6 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
This language was from the draft EO in February. It may or may not change.
2 replies 3 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
You and I both know this language will be used to prosecute queers for trying to existpic.twitter.com/qnkyUse1Gb
3 replies 33 retweets 36 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
If a church wants to perform same-sex weddings, and the state refuses to issue marriage licenses, this EO orders the state to stop, right?
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @Octalthorpe @EmilyGorcenski
Or does "religious liberty" mean the freedom to be a member of a specific sect with very precise beliefs? Like it always does?
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes
It means protecting evangelical christian fragility.
-
-
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
Yeah, "religious liberty" always seems to mean "everyone is required to act as though they were a member of our sect". Veronica Orwellian.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.