And then you went on to parrot a bunch of transphobic garbage. https://twitter.com/Anyechka/status/855193304799039488 …
-
-
And you're a pretty shitty historian for ignoring the vast anthropological evidence of trans people in many cultures.
-
Almost like all that sexual dimorphism really made a difference.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If I were biological essentialist, I wouldn't accept post-menopausal, the infertile, childfree by choice, women who lost genitals or organs.
-
Those things aren't incompatible with biological essentialism. They're often weilded as weapons by y'all.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I like how you think you know all about who I am and what I believe based on being gender-critical and supporting TRUE science and history.
-
I don't know who you are but I do know what you're doing and what you're doing is practicing reductive, harmful biological essentialism.
-
I care about women and girls, scientific and historical accuracy. Stating facts isn't hatred.
-
No facts have been made up. It's easy to find all these things if you look outside of the TA echo chamber.
-
Yeah, like google scholar where you will find reams of support for non chromosomal science that explains trans identities.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That's because gender is a social construct and innate gender is a myth. There are two sexes. This is not a transphobic observation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Third genders are NOT the same as modern-day trans people.
-
yo
@Anyechka, why do you care. just let people do what they like. it's a free country
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.