oh honey you totally misunderstand the use of imbalanced and asymmetric here. That's ok, I'll help out.
So the data weren't public and the exposure was intentional.
-
-
However not malicious. Doxxing has an implication of facilitating harm to the subject
-
Was actually malicious
-
But keep going on about pedantic distinctions which add nothing to the debate.
-
Actually, don't because it's annoying and you should find better ways to feel superior.
-
I don't consider researching 70,000 people and releasing the findings the same as digging up everything you can on a specific private person
-
Dumping private and identifiable info is still doxing, there's no requirement for exhaustiveness
-
But you're again, definition lawyering to no clear point aside from a desperate need to be right.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.