Thanks. Assuming this is what you meant, Emily, then that's not within their purview.
Next time try staying with the context of the original tweet
-
-
The article you linked seemed to suggest he gathered public data without permission, not digging up info on specific people to harm them
-
He then posted all their PII on an open data repo, unmasked, linked to their private responses
-
Information normally gated behind controlled access
-
So the data weren't public and the exposure was intentional.
-
However not malicious. Doxxing has an implication of facilitating harm to the subject
-
Was actually malicious
-
But keep going on about pedantic distinctions which add nothing to the debate.
-
Actually, don't because it's annoying and you should find better ways to feel superior.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.