I was talking about how GG failed to show up in glorious defense of ethics, some choosing instead to attack someone defending them.
Imbalanced doesn't mean biased. It, along with asymmetric, is about skew towards one particular story vs the distribution.
-
-
I am, remember, talking about 70,000 people being doxed. And I don't want to get bogged down in any particular story, regardless of slant
-
Because the focus of that narrative doesn't capture the balance of the 70,000 harmed.
-
All doxing stories are bad. I don't see some as better than others. My post history reflects this stance.
-
Next time try staying with the context of the original tweet
-
The article you linked seemed to suggest he gathered public data without permission, not digging up info on specific people to harm them
-
He then posted all their PII on an open data repo, unmasked, linked to their private responses
-
Information normally gated behind controlled access
-
So the data weren't public and the exposure was intentional.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.