Nah, not interested. Thanks tho.
-
-
Hmm, maybe they should've given you context; allow me. To say gamergate was one side doxxing is plainly wrong as those articles show.
-
Ok. I didn't make that claim.
-
You did not explicitly make that claim. Unfortunately, your phrasing permits the claim. GG is rather personal to those personally involved.
-
"Yout phrasing permits that claim" why with this logic I can say anything.
-
I thank you for attacking Emil for the flaws made. All I meant was that those articles are worth reading if you want to look into
#Gamergate -
I assumed that your tweet was about
#GG. Seems like I was wrong.#Gamergate is an interesting story though. I hope you have a nice day! -
I thought this was about GG too, seeing as though Emily has been talking about GG.
-
I was talking about how GG failed to show up in glorious defense of ethics, some choosing instead to attack someone defending them.
- 25 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Ya know how to have a balanced narrative, so why don't you try some GG sources? I mean, if they're wrong, it's at least useful to know.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.