I mean, I kind of live here, and it’s not like these aren’t interlocking concerns.
-
-
Replying to @asmallteapot
yeah but "us centering its distant concerns over asian nations in asian affairs" is kinda the source of this mess.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
Good thing I’m not advocating for the US to center its concerns or for the numerous disasters that’d result from a strike
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @asmallteapot @EmilyGorcenski
I want six-party talks to resume. I want DPRK denuclearized. I want to stop escalation in the Pacific before it gets worse.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @asmallteapot @EmilyGorcenski
Is that not squarely in the interests of every regional power? Of humanity as a whole?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @asmallteapot
Of course it is, I don't disagree. But we need to be doing a better job communicating and worrying about the present threat.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
The present threat includes missiles, nuclear weapons, and slow-steady progress toward miniaturization.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @asmallteapot @EmilyGorcenski
Things will be so, so much worse just for the other regional powers if the program is allowed to continue.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @asmallteapot
Right. That's why we stop it now using the already catastrophic threat model.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
The threat model also includes kicking the can down the road again. That is what I am most afraid of.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Well, that's usually us fucking it up, so yeah. I'm worried about that, too.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.