50 Tomahawks is overkill for that airfield. Way overkill. Even if you destroy every bike shed.
-
-
The recently developed Joint Multi-Effects Warhead System gives Tomahawks bunker-busting capabilities. I don't know if it's deployed.
-
But 50-60 still sounds like a LOT to disable a relatively minor airfield.
-
Anyone else think Trump has stock in mfr of Tomahawks? So who is that...Raytheon? Yeah.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That actually sounds like they've been planning this for a while rather than being a sudden reaction, doesn't it?
-
Almost every airfield has a targeting plan already formed. Including domestic airfields, probably.
-
it sounds a LOT like this plan Obama choose not to execute: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/08/30/pentagon-war-costs-syria/2748985/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This was a measured response (shocking from this administration!) and made a statement. This is classic Mattis.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
military intelligence has targets planned all the time in hot areas, action or no action.this base important also bc used by Iranian agents.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Now that I think about it, does Trump have the self-control necessary to only use minimum force?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.