50 Tomahawks is overkill for that airfield. Way overkill. Even if you destroy every bike shed.
-
-
This airfield has no major hangars. No massive pad to house bombers.https://twitter.com/EmilyGorcenski/status/850160004892041216 …
-
I count 19 hangars capable of holding 2-3 jets each. 2 runways to crater. Plus fuel depots. So... I guess maayyybbbe 50.
-
The recently developed Joint Multi-Effects Warhead System gives Tomahawks bunker-busting capabilities. I don't know if it's deployed.
-
But 50-60 still sounds like a LOT to disable a relatively minor airfield.
-
Anyone else think Trump has stock in mfr of Tomahawks? So who is that...Raytheon? Yeah.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
(And I'm seeing it was even more -- 59.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.