A short thread on why the Census issue is hurtful to trans people:
-
-
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
There is almost no solid data on trans healthcare. The best survey on US prevalence? It uses smoking cessation surveys and stats games.
1 reply 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
Because we're often excluded from inusrance coverage, doctors don't use the diagnosis code that would best apply: F64.1 in ICD-10.
1 reply 1 retweet 17 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
Every doctor uses different codes. When my insurance had me coded as male, my endo used "hypertrophy of the breast."
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
I've seen all sorts; my favorite was "agenesis of the cervix." But this is super harmful actually.
2 replies 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
If you break your arm in a bicycle accident, there's a code for that. If you're involved in a spacecraft accident, there's a code. Really.
1 reply 5 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
But since we can't use gender dysphoria codes, we have no tracking at all. Which means we have no data on health outcomes.
2 replies 5 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
Which also means it's nearly impossible to direct resources in any meaningful way other than dropping LGBT clinics in the big cities.
1 reply 2 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
So the census could have given us, at the very least, a denominator to understand where and how. But now we have to wait another decade.
3 replies 5 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
I felt relieved, because it could also be a list of folks to come after. Probably paranoid?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Historically, roundups have always been driven by localities providing support. Our name changes, dl changes, etc. are on file
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.