Her fear was of being "labeled." Ok, that's legit. My fear is of being assaulted in a bathroom. That's worse than labeling.
-
-
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @neontaster
So yep, on a scale of human rights offenses, I do think that state violence matters more than social ostracization.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
Now it's state violence? You must be tired from moving the goalposts around this much.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @neontaster
The revocation and restriction of civil rights to groups has long been considered state violence. No goalposts moving.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
Calling nonviolent acts "violence" is a great way to get people to stop caring. FYI.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @neontaster
This is actual tone policing now. But if you want a logical argument, denying bathroom access causes physiological damage.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @neontaster
This is borne out in statistics. So yes, policy can be violence.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @neontaster
Fine. It's not violence. Civil rights denial matters more than social ostracization. Back on track.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
"Fuck your problem because mine is worse" is a real weaksauce sympathy ploy.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
"Fuck your problem, my problem is the revocation of civil rights" seems only to fall flat when folks allow 2nd class citizens.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.