no such thing as a "genetic male." Genes have nothing to do with gender.
-
-
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @MhorRioghain33
Cis men have been documented having a uterus. Cis women can have XY. XXY, XXXY also exist. Chimeras exist.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
And that's not what the GOP care about. Not trying to dismiss gender ID, it is important. Just focus on GOPs BS.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MhorRioghain33
It's possible to focus on the GOP's BS without erasing trans women.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @MhorRioghain33
Our identities are worth more than a jab. And these notions directly affect our access to healthcare.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
Trans access to healthcare & fair treatment by a Dr who can accept a person's id vs genitalia are not impacted by her post.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MhorRioghain33
Nope, but awareness does help increase that access.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @MhorRioghain33
And you're getting all uppity to someone personally affected by this based on what, a gentle reminder to a mutual?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
I wasn't being uppity, just didn't see the need to get down picking apart a post that had a simple point to make against GOP
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MhorRioghain33
My existence is worth at least a gentle fucking reminder.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
And that point is not stronger than the cost of erasing trans people
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.