cause we know the numbers suck and no one else is gonna do the math
-
-
Replying to @meatcomputer @morganastra
fwiw, I had been tracking all transition-related costs for a while but ended up losing the data when Quicken died
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I would say that $100/mo was accurate, but it's hard to compare directly. It's a hard modeling problem.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @morganastra
yeah I'm around $200 or so, lost health insurance 2 MO ago
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'd estimate it was 60 dollars of health essential purchases, 50 or so elective
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @morganastra @EmilyGorcenski
this is imo, a very valuable distinction and the key vector for denial of trans medical care
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @meatcomputer @morganastra
The distinctions between "women's costs" vs "trans costs" are relevant, too
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @meatcomputer
i was comparing to if I'd been cis and otherwise had the same life, mostly accounting for that
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @morganastra @meatcomputer
apropos of nothing, I have been tracking surgery costs and will eventually do an analysis on those
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
including what would/would not have been handled by single payer
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.