No, they are not. "Fuck you I have to piss" is not only not the same ballpark as rape threats, it's not even the same sport
-
-
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
so you're saying there's no hatefullness in her comments?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thewargarurumon
Yeah. Saying "fuck you" to the presidency, even literally, is a pretty tame.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
well i have seen worse(and done worse), but i don't consider that "healthy discussion"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thewargarurumon
"healthy discussion" isn't the standard. And shouldn't be. People whose rights are being taken have right to be furious.
5 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
"People whose rights are being taken have right to be furious" everybody has the right to be furious, there is no law.....
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thewargarurumon
This isn't about the law. It's about Twitter's policies and their responsibilities and power.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
what responsibility? to controll the debate, the discussion?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thewargarurumon
No. The responsibility to provide access to people with lesser privilege
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
i think the only people of "lesser privilege" that have less access, are old people(digitally iliterate) and disabled people
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.