100% agreed.
-
-
Replying to @ifthedevilisix @EmilyGorcenski
But I get the feeling you're saying Milo's inciting violence is equivalent to actual physical violence.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ifthedevilisix @EmilyGorcenski
In my opinion, this is the tactical trap to avoid at all costs.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ifthedevilisix @EmilyGorcenski
I don't mean to treat Milo in the abstract. I'm trying to use his example to make a broader point about strategic efficacy.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ifthedevilisix
I'm not talking about strategic efficacy! I'm talking about saving my friends' lives!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
right. and in that case, I agree with you. anything to avoid the violence incited by milo is worth it. I'm with you there.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ifthedevilisix @EmilyGorcenski
I'm just trying to reconcile the abstract and the reality in my own head.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ifthedevilisix @EmilyGorcenski
Following your arg.: 1. Milo's speech will incite violence inevitably 2. In order to stop this, we must do whatever it takes
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ifthedevilisix @EmilyGorcenski
Granted that Milo's speech will definitely incite violence (which it probably will) I'm in the same boat.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ifthedevilisix @EmilyGorcenski
But how do we know whether or not a speech will turn people to violence? Given Milo's background and our current milieu..
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I'd say an established history of "these are specific people, we should remove them from public life" is a strong indicator
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.