protestors aren't violating his free speech rights. Free speech rights are *only* the prohibition of govt interference.
-
-
hmm.. this is a tough one. I have a feeling we're going to keep going in circles. Final try...
-
His speech should not be tolerated, but neither should violence. Non-violent protest can be, and must be, the way forward.
-
Speech inciting violence is intolerable, as is violence itself.
-
Yep, and when someone incites violence, self-defence is justified.
-
100% agreed.
-
But I get the feeling you're saying Milo's inciting violence is equivalent to actual physical violence.
-
In my opinion, this is the tactical trap to avoid at all costs.
-
I don't mean to treat Milo in the abstract. I'm trying to use his example to make a broader point about strategic efficacy.
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.