That makes sense to me on a one-on-one basis, but when it comes to large political movements, non-violence is essential.
-
-
Here's where our opinions diverge. I'm just thinking about this playing out all the way. Hear me out—
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He is dangerous and uses his platform to deliberately incite violence with a wink and a nudge.
-
If we respond to every speech-based provocation of violence with violence, we're doing Milo's work for him, right?
-
for example, let's think about hardcore Nazis and KKK members. https://www.aclu.org/other/aclu-history-taking-stand-free-speech-skokie …
-
Stop comparing him in the abstract. He doesn't work in the abstract.
-
I'm not really talking about him now. I'm talking strategy in an abstract way. But it applies to the UC Berkley response.
-
Does that make sense?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.