This is literally the exact opposite of what I found needed to happen after reading EVERY SINGLE VOTING MACHINE TEST REPORT.https://twitter.com/fschouten/status/829018421778116608 …
-
-
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
As a reminder: https://github.com/Gorcenski/voting-machines …
3 replies 29 retweets 28 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
Adherence to standards is currently voluntary, on a state-by-state basis. Unclear what would happen if the EAC goes away.
2 replies 7 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
I was also interviewed by the Daily Dot about this topic.http://www.dailydot.com/debug/electronic-voting-machines-source-code-no-regulation/ …
1 reply 12 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
What I said needs to happen:pic.twitter.com/Mh04Dt01ti
2 replies 19 retweets 29 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
The joint intel report confirmed that Russia investigated voting machines. Although they likely weren't compromised, they are compromisable.
1 reply 9 retweets 17 likes
Securing them as critical infrastructure should be a key priority. And no, this is not a repeat of 2004.
-
-
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
2004's issues were supposedly addressed with VVSG 2005. But there are substantial flaws in the development lifecycle.
2 replies 3 retweets 11 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.