I want to talk about the hammer and sickle for a bit. I don't favor it, even though I do recognize the magnitude of Soviet WW2 contributions
-
-
And that kind of gets to the core of my politic. I don't consider myself any particular label. My advocacy is against state violence, period
-
And if we can do that with a liberalist regulatory structure great. But we tried. And failed. And somehow keep trying.
-
The Nazis were defeated by disparate politics recognizing that fascism must be eradicated. Not because of America. Not because of Russia.
-
So liberalists need to take a good look at the world and see who they're willing to ally with. If you're outraged, good. But you need allies
-
And we need to recognize that that solution approach has suffered what is, until Bannon is defeated, an unrecoverable loss.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
No defender of Soviet brutality, but at EOD there is no victory over fascism w/out Stalin. Scale of loss is unimaginable.
-
read the thread.
-
I did. The unfortunate truth is that we are in the High Castle w/o SU.
-
apparently not. I literally start the thread by acknowledging that.
-
But there is nothing that the Allies did that mitigated the SU losses. Literally. We let them bleed. Defend that please.
-
Holy shit you are missing the thesis here
-
Which is? I probably agree with the thesis laid out in different terms, but as presented no.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.