@EmilyGorcenski blues@are filled in acting capacity...
-
-
Replying to @Sirpoopdawg
do you have a confirmation on that? Several were unfilled before election.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
they are unfilled, but they don't remain "empty" as those duties fulfilled by others. They don't remain empty and unfulfilld
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Sirpoopdawg
Agreed that duties handled by others, but that's different than "acting" role, which has specific time limits.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
agreed as well. I think we're arguing there same side. Doesn't Congress appoint those spots? Or R they promoted from acting?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Sirpoopdawg
Presidential appointment. That's the jarring bit. He's not even close to naming anyone for these spots.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @Sirpoopdawg
And require Senate confirmation, too. There doesn't seem to be any structure in place for getting this done.
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
you are in the know. Can you post an updated chart with names and whether they are "acting" or just fulfilling roles? 1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Sirpoopdawg
I have no real way to verify who's in what role.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
I see. Well thanks for humoring me. Piqued my curiosity now.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
IMO a DC journo should be doing this work.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.