granted. but you are establishing the absence of literal dilemmas by assertion.
-
-
Replying to @mediajunkie
Well I can't prove a negative. But I can speak from expertise, which you can accept or not at your leisure.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
fair enough. i'm stuck depending on my own, it seems.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mediajunkie
Show me an actual ethical dilemma that doesn't require omitting external context and operates within established ethics rules.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @mediajunkie
You could probably point to like, idk, a dozen or so easy to find Conflicts of financial Interest, which I'll grant...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @mediajunkie
But I think that's evidently not the scope the OP was asking about.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
agreed. not talking about simple conflicts of interest.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mediajunkie
Right. So what I'm saying is *rarely* do we encounter situations where two applicable ethical codes conflict.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
well, that's more like it! happy to stipulate to that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mediajunkie
Right, and only in those cases can we get a dilemma. Otherwise we just have an unpleasant failure.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
There's no dilemma if it's "act ethically vs. not"
-
-
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
agree. just as "I don't want to clean up after my dog" is not an ethical dilemma.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.