Oh, uh... here's a news report:https://www.google.com/amp/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN14L0OP?client=ms-android-verizon …
-
-
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
I don't know that I have a good one-page summary on its history. Hm. I should write one.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
Short version: 1557 bans sex discrim, a big feature of ACA. HHS decided last year that LGBT discrim. === sex discrim.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
gave ins. cos and employers until jan 1 to design plans that removed language of blanket exclusions, syncs with ACA year
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
some things (e.g. dr can't refuse treatment, etc.) went into effect immediately or at 60 days
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
HHS has power to interpret rule thusly based on supreme court case Auer v Robbins
8:49 AM - 1 Jan 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.