public figures that they have not examined.
-
-
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @TrueFactsStated
Third, the act of diagnosis and examination is a consent-based practice, as is the privacy of such diagnoses.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @TrueFactsStated
In short, you are either not qualified to state a medical opinion or you are in a multi-fold breach of professional ethics.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @bjimd
If
@TrueFactsStated is not a physician. then he's not bound to an ethical code. But then he's not qualified to make his claim.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @bjimd
and if you are qualified, then you cannot make a diagnostic claim like
@TrueFactsStated did unless you have treated him.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
In either case, this narrative of Trump as mentally ill does nothing but further harm the image of MH sufferers.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
When coming up against an authoritarian with documented ties to a foreign power, the best you can do is armchair dx?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Trump's behavior is dangerous. But you are seeing a limited, selected sampling of what goes on.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You cannot adequately claim any condition in the presence of such a heavy sampling bias.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Why not just go with "he's a dangerous racist fascist asshole" instead of making up diagnoses with no standing?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.