So not only are Uber's SDCs unsafe for bicyclists/pedestrians, but in the event that they injure one, it's unclear how they're liable.
-
-
-
Self-driving cars will probably reduce injuries/deaths. But that's not the only term in our society's ethical calculus.
-
I've said for a long time we need a regulatory solution for this. Tort theory is insufficient. *looks at incoming administration* Welp.
-
And as far as riding in one? Getting in the car is a waiver of liability:https://www.cnet.com/roadshow/news/uber-liability-self-driving-cars/ …
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Yes that's it
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Robots aren't people, my friend.
-
Neither are refrigerators but product liability exists.
-
My point in invoking Romney's corporations comment is that robots may be more like LLCs than products
-
Maybe. Who knows? We'll find out soon.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I guess someone should build a fleet of autonomous killbots and test that theory!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@buttermilk1 so what are the legal consequences of slashing the tyres of experimental#AVs moving on public streets?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.