I don't buy the hot take that FB/Google are already the registry. They have the data but none of the infra to interface with extant systems.
-
-
And if it must be deliberately engineered, it can be deliberately resisted.
-
help me with that, em. How?
-
Know contracting databases. Learn who players are. Watch their moves, deny them access to services.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
but being cynical: if the goal were to generate a list of people who might be muslim, a small team of interns could do it
-
Yes, but such a list is useless unless it can be accessed by LEO, Customs, etc.
-
Fascists care about absolute control, not database integrity
-
i'm sorry for arguing. i feel more like crying
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I haven't worked with any of these systems and you have, but I can think of ways to map the data between systems. But.
-
But probably it would depend a lot on the requirements. Govt contract would not build the system the way I am thinking.
-
for sure. Key is to think like a fascist with no understanding of technology
-
Right! You could make such a project into a maze of twisty little project plans and requirements if you were working on it
-
exactly... even more than it will be anyways!

End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
was following ur chain of thought till 0 chance. That amount of certainty can't come a objective or truthful insight.
-
You think FB/Goog are going to give write access to a network of hundreds of two-bit software contractors?
-
def greater than an absolute 0 chance, you're a data scientist , when was the last time a p/q value was exactly 0?
-
Yeah I'm not working in probability spaces here.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.