Hm. The author confirmed my pronouns, I verified them, saw them used correctly in an accuracy-checking draft, and "her" ends up in final.
-
-
-
I'd be more upset by this, but I do accept she/her, and also I have a hard time fighting pronoun battles when I should be fighting Nazis.
-
Fuck yes. Side-eye for the pronoun battles, boots on ground for the important ones.
-
i do think pronoun battles are very important, at least to me
-
Yeah. Though ... I want the right to have a pronoun battle to remain intact.
-
I still like "she" so it's a low-reward fight; if the author used "he", tho, as some others have, that'd be war.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I'm still puzzled about lack of acceptance testing. There should be software testing requirements.
-
The fact that end-to-end validation of vote handling code isn't requires blows my mind. Like, that's its *only job*.
-
complete lunacy. I guess that should not be a surprising
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
OMG......do you know which 16 states have no requirement for validation?
-
Yeah, it's in my Github repo: AK AR FL HI KS ME MI MS MT NE NH NJ OK TN VT WV
-
Thanks!!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Saw that earlier. Unbelievable.
-
Waiting to see what is said and done about it. If anything.
-
yeah, wonder, grrr
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Facinating piece about electronic voting machine code issues. Well Worth Reading!
#Recount2016#AuditTheVote - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.