To write software for this device you have to: - Maintain a complete design history file - Perform a traceability analysis ...
-
-
Does it get my vote right? Is it robust to dirty fingerprints and pen colors and creases in the paper? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
-
Can I look up a database and see failures and recalls? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
-
.
@Slestac points me to this: https://www.eac.gov/testing_and_certification/testing_and_certification_program.aspx … This exists as a certification effort, but seems to lack the FDA's teeth. -
To be clear: industry standards are not enough in high-risk devices. Regulatory oversight by a congressionally-empowered agency is needed.
-
This document contains all state regulations: https://www.eac.gov/assets/1/Page/State%20Requirements%20and%20the%20Federal%20Voting%20System%20Testing%20and%20Certification%20Program.pdf … Most back-trace to federal *certification* requirements.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.