The tattoo I just got was based on a Tennyson poem (The Two Voices), so I want to talk for a sec about how scholarship handles queerness.
-
-
Mainstream scholarship goes to absurdist lengths to even acknowledge what we'd today call queer love. "Oh, there's no evidence."
-
Because leaving evidence could ruin your life. In some 20+ US states today, it still can.
-
There are some more modern takes that look at Tennyson as "androgynous" or possibly "bisexual," but even these are clunky.
-
The point is, multi-faceted gender and sexuality dynamics have *always* been present in our art, media, and culture.
-
And academics have historically gone through exceptional lengths to erase these interpretations to hold up their heroes as normative.
-
This still happens in technology, which fancies itself as academia-adjacent. The CoC battles in *every* language community make this clear.
-
When we trend toward the default, we erase the beautiful details of a person's life that caused them to create in the first place.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.