Wow. This is an element of medical device/IoT ethics that I have not previously considered.http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/08/trading-in-stock-of-medical-device-paused-after-hackers-team-with-short-seller/ …
-
-
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
i agree with this, however I'm concerned by the specific "vulnerability"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gravislizard @EmilyGorcenski
if I perch on a rooftop with a magnetron & dish antenna I can kill car engines & pacemakers with targeted energy.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gravislizard @EmilyGorcenski
this has been the case for decades but it's seen as "if someone wants to kill you, they can." what makes this different?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @gravislizard
Stock prices reflect FDA clearance, which includes cybersecurity analysis requirements. Specific harm vector presumed nulled.
6:10 PM - 28 Aug 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.