So, do the people who think Erlang/Elixir aren't object-oriented also think that JS is non-OO language?
-
-
@EmilyGorcenski@aredridel Hmm. I agree with you that it's an overloaded term, and that it often is not used in ways that convey meaning.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@EmilyGorcenski@aredridel But there is a *difference* between code I see as using objects effectively, & code I see as not.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@EmilyGorcenski@aredridel So, I think there's a kernel of meaningful concept there, even if it's clouded by decades of nerdfighting.... -
@betsythemuffin@aredridel That's just it. Also, the usage is so often based on the backing tools that existed at language conception. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.