Politicians have donors. Some donors are publicly held corporations. Publicly held corporations have public earnings calls. Public calls can be disrupted.
-
-
Fair enough but if you want to demoralize people send them to a brick wall. I disagree that this is a viable option.
-
If you’re demoralized by a low effort action that fails then I have bad news for any real hope of change and we may as well cash out now
-
I disagree. I just think efforts should be directed to opportunities more likely to have engagement. As I said, shareholders have an opportunity to speak at shareholder meetings. You aren’t getting through on investor calls. The six you know are outliers.
-
Okay, and I ask this in all seriousness: what do you propose as more viable alternatives? I honestly want engagement opportunities. I'm poor, have a disability, and am caring for my disabled mother while working full time. I'm stretched really thin, but voting isn't enough.
-
I don’t think there is a two month/two year solution. Honestly think this is the long game and will take years. And it will start with conversations with people we don’t agree with. One at a time. Patience. But we are frustrated and I don’t know how I’m going to do that either.
-
First, this is so vague I don't really know what it means or would look like in your estimation. Second, people, including me, have been having conversations this entire time. I personally have found it wildly ineffective, and it certainly didn't stop us from getting here.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.