Yes but nonbinary people were never ever supported by the system so the change has limited material impact.
-
-
Some? Yes. Indisputably. Not arguing against that. The “vast majority?” Disagree. And argue that it’s erasure.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Considering the vast majority of the language focuses on the transition between two binary sexes where before it was vague and allowed some breathing room that might actually allow some ease in at least changing one’s name on these documents, or applying to them with a nb...
-
The passport policy was already between two binary sexes. The language change focuses on medical transition. The name change policy deltas target IDs older than 1 year, which won’t even affect CA’s new law for at least a year, but affects binary trans folks *right now*.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.