Actually, let’s talk about this a little more because I’ve spent the last 2 years thinking about how I would do it if I were, say, a hostile foreign power.https://twitter.com/EmilyGorcenski/status/1033056465567862784 …
-
Show this thread
-
Obviously, setting votes to a billion in each precinct would probably raise a few red flags. So that’s not feasible. But what is?
1 reply 1 retweet 20 likesShow this thread -
Anti-Trumpism has spent a lot of time exhorting people to vote. Voter suppression aside, there is an expectation that voter turnout will be higher in some demographics
2 replies 2 retweets 23 likesShow this thread -
That sets our baseline. Right there we’ve got an outlier to work with. That means that it’s fair game to do whatever you want if you have access over the final vote tallies.
1 reply 3 retweets 15 likesShow this thread -
So if I were to hack the vote—and I pause here to inform my monitors that I have no such plan—I would begin by manipulating votes within this bubble of extra voters.
1 reply 3 retweets 25 likesShow this thread -
To put it another way, suppose Smallville has a pretty consistent turnout for midterm elections of between 13 and 17% of voters. But this year, thanks to civic engagement, they get 22%. That’s at least 5% of all eligible voters you can fuck with, or a full ~33% of votes
1 reply 5 retweets 21 likesShow this thread -
Now, we assume the extra votes will be more heavily distributed against Trump, right? But what if they’re not? What if we make them not? How can we even tell?
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likesShow this thread -
Our alternative hypothesis is that we’re going to see a change in distribution. But what if we don’t? The best we can do is fail to reject the null hypothesis. So if I were hacking votes, in a contested or pro-Trump precinct, I’d make the votes look distributed like 2016.
1 reply 2 retweets 14 likesShow this thread -
And if you do this there is *absolutely no way to catch it*
1 reply 1 retweet 14 likesShow this thread -
Not through statistical means, at least. Your priors are too damn strong.
1 reply 1 retweet 19 likesShow this thread
The best way to get away with things is to go unnoticed. And the best way to go unnoticed is to have no meaningful change that can be detected. This means that a ton of votes don’t need to be swapped. Just a handful per precinct.
-
-
When we think of election impropriety we think of dictators stuffing the ballot box to get 99% of the votes. It’s much more damaging, tho, if you can ensure that a 3 pt margin remains a 3 pt margin.
5 replies 14 retweets 32 likesShow this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.