I know people get pissed about the ACLU defending bigots but they sorta have to once and a while to guarantee there's some legals precedent. Almost all the time they defend marginalized people instead but it doesn't get national news.
Well thanks for establishing that the terror attacks I narrowly survived were a necessary bit of fear in a bad municipality
-
-
Ya, that was wildly out of line for the ACLU and you know I wasn't arguing about that.
-
It wasn’t out of line. It was so in line with what they do that they applied a pre-canned formula with less than 72 hours preparation and succeeded
-
I mean, it was morally out of line and shameful. They didn't investigate properly and that's on them.
-
I don’t know how else to tell you that this is the pattern of behavior the ACLU takes with regards to bigots’ cases. They are almost always 1A cases with a pressing need for time that doesn’t allow for investigation, and they almost always jump the queue
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Or if you didnt, I will be clear: they should not defend bigots (and probably most people) who strongly indicate they will commit violence at that protest.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.