There's literally photographic proof that you're lying. Why are you so eager to defend neo-Nazis and White Nationalists, even going so far as to deny indisputable evidence? Are party politics that important to you?
-
-
I claimed Fields' car never touched her. Now that you can't meaningfully dispute that, you two hilarious clowns are moving the goalposts. You're almost as stupid as you look -- not quite, though. Nice try!
-
Dude. Even *if* it didn't touch her, which is irrefutably did, her "heart attack" still would have been caused by the trauma of being in a crowd of people mowed down. For their beliefs. Of anti-racism. Still no refutation of my claims that you support a criminal racist.
-
When an uninformed far-left dimwit is making a pitiful straw-man argument against me, I'm not inclined to stop her. It's entertaining.
-
Defending the acts of a man who intentionally set out to kill and main people based on political differences is akin to supporting domestic terrorism. You're digging your own hole with every reply where you don't (or can't) come right out and disavow Field's actions.
-
Whether or not you believe the car touched her, it was still a reprehensible act of politically motivated violence. And you're defending it because you also don't like the people targeted. The epitome of politics over principles. Sad!
-
I'm defending Fields' actions? No. Only in your sad little mind. Of course, every time a commie dies, the world does become a slightly better place.
-
So you agree that politically motivated murder is wrong, regardless of the beliefs of the group being targeted?
-
Circumstances matter a great deal. I generally prefer physical removal to more drastic measures.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.