I can give you extremely granular details about these fuckers and when I say that the effect you mention is a sliver compared to what they do say to say trust me, I know.
-
-
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @kroati1
Again, you can list people all day. It is not evidence that they, and other participants, were not influenced by propaganda. It’s just a stupid claim. Stop.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EmilyEggbert @EmilyGorcenski
seriously, why do so many of you people try to assign one continuous organized narrative (that moves into conspiracy theory at times), and dismissing that way how the whole UTR &similar developed and evolved independently without outside influence, like Emily is saying
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kroati1 @EmilyGorcenski
Because “like Emily is saying” is nonsense. There is no one on earth who is independent of cultural messaging and the right has been awash in directed online cultural messaging since Al Gore’s internet was opened to public usage.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyEggbert @kroati1
I cannot explain to you how irrelevant your own argument makes the rest of your point. If that's the case, then it is no more relevant than the choice of math textbook or how much fast food advertising is present on highway billboards.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Your own argument totally undermines your claim that whatever influence may have existed had any material impact in any measurable way. You have provided no mechanism, no channel, indeed you haven't even established the direction of the arrow of causation.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @kroati1
Hey, all historians ever, Emily G has discovered that propaganda has no impact, because you can’t prove a direct causation from a specific piece of propaganda to a specific action! Rewrite everything!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyEggbert @kroati1
I didn't say propaganda has no impact. I said you have no evidence that propaganda made a proportional impact on the outcomes you claim it did. But nice strawman.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @kroati1
Not a straw man.pic.twitter.com/ooR7f43TKb
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyEggbert @kroati1
For fuck's sake how can you not see that "propaganda has no impact" and "Russia was not involved in the violence of charlottesville" are two COMPLETELY DIFFERENT STATEMENTS
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Your utter refusal to acknowledge that the neo-Nazi violence was the result of deeply-ingrained, American-raised racism is complicity in white supremacy. You are Russia-washing the actual violence suffered by my friends and I. And as a survivor, it is disrespectful to me.
-
-
You are being muted now, and you can go about ranting about Russian propaganda all you want. Meanwhile, I will be continuing my highly effective and decimating campaign against the very real white supremacist propaganda.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @kroati1
Honey. You. Are. White. I. Am. A. Target. Of. White. Supremacy. You. Are. Not. This. Is. Not. About. You.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.