I have knowledge of the investigations and lawsuits that you do not. I know where these people live, what kind of beer they like, whether they correct typos or not, who their exes are. I have sat through hours of court proceedings and meetings with law enforcement and so on.
-
-
All you're saying is, "people part of society are affected in some way by the things society does." Why weren't the antifascists affected by this? Why weren't the Nazis affected by the antifascist Russian propaganda? This makes no sense.
-
Like, this is eighth grade metaphysics vs. my evidence which has so far held up in federal court.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Hey, all historians ever, Emily G has discovered that propaganda has no impact, because you can’t prove a direct causation from a specific piece of propaganda to a specific action! Rewrite everything!
-
I didn't say propaganda has no impact. I said you have no evidence that propaganda made a proportional impact on the outcomes you claim it did. But nice strawman.
-
-
For fuck's sake how can you not see that "propaganda has no impact" and "Russia was not involved in the violence of charlottesville" are two COMPLETELY DIFFERENT STATEMENTS
-
Your utter refusal to acknowledge that the neo-Nazi violence was the result of deeply-ingrained, American-raised racism is complicity in white supremacy. You are Russia-washing the actual violence suffered by my friends and I. And as a survivor, it is disrespectful to me.
-
You are being muted now, and you can go about ranting about Russian propaganda all you want. Meanwhile, I will be continuing my highly effective and decimating campaign against the very real white supremacist propaganda.
-
You can be all Trumpian about your “highly effective and decimating campaign”


all you want. You are missing the forest for your very local trees.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.