Is it so hard for others to understand that social media content is just a tool that is used by them to promote and initiate other (less suspecting / more suggestible) people into their communities, by appealing to the racist/phobic/similar beliefs that already low key existed?
-
-
I can from memory recite the names of over a dozen leaders and their affiliations past and present. I know who drove what vehicles and when. I know where their families live and where they work.
-
I have gigabytes of video and audio and recorded phone calls and chat logs. I can point to a vast array of causal influences and factors. You have, at best, a distal secondary effect. At best.
-
I can tell you about Jakub Zak and his activities in the Illinois area before he got arrested and charged with 8 counts of not having a FOID card. I can tell you how he recruited a friend, how his mom has a minivan and how he hung antisemitic posters outside a Jewish preschool
-
I can tell you about Derrick Davis and how he’s got repressed gender issues and who his short term roommate was and how he doesn’t have a guest bed in his Mechanicsville home.
-
I can give you extremely granular details about these fuckers and when I say that the effect you mention is a sliver compared to what they do say to say trust me, I know.
-
Again, you can list people all day. It is not evidence that they, and other participants, were not influenced by propaganda. It’s just a stupid claim. Stop.
-
I don't have to prove that they weren't. You have to prove that they were. That's how the burden of proof works. And you can't.
-
Prove that propaganda influenced Germans in the 1930s.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.