I’m going to start blocking over the Naomi Wu stuff. Seriously.
-
-
And whatever reasonable threat to safety existed against Naomi, at least the equivalent exists against Sarah, especially since fucking Trump called her out and in case you haven’t noticed, journalists are being fucking murdered.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Naomi doxxed the editor-in-chief before the article was even published. VICE asked if she would be comfortable talking about a gray area issue (i.e. not her marital status but the sexism that fuels those rumors), to which she responded by refusing to accept VICE's
-
response and maliciously doxxing the editor in chief which she was put into contact with to discuss her concerns, even asking if the editor lived with kids in his house before publishing his address. The article was published and described Naomi in glowing terms, with the
-
only mention of topics that Wu didn't want discussed being to address the doxxing and publicity storm Wu was trying to create about it. Given that the article doesn't mention that the rumored husband is white and does not talk about any of the prohibited issues, and
-
given that Wu discusses her advocacy for gender equality in her own Medium post, I can't figure out how VICE endangered her. If she thought that the article was going to include dangerous information before it was published, sure, but it doesn't make sense to continue this feud
-
after the article came out with no objectionable content, and it doesn't make sense dedicating so much effort to focusing Sarah Jeong's indepedent commentary on the issue. At this point, it seems like a vendetta Wu holds because she blames VICE for her getting banned for doxxing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.